What is the main consequence of having a franchise player on the roster?

Having a franchise player on the roster primarily leads to limitation in player acquisition flexibility. A franchise player typically receives a substantial salary that can consume a significant portion of the team's salary cap. This financial commitment reduces the cap space available for signing other players, which in turn restricts the team's ability to acquire new talent through free agency or trades.

Moreover, while a franchise player can have a positive impact on fan attendance and overall team revenues, those effects are secondary to how their contract affects the salary cap and flexibility. The franchise designation is often used to retain key players, and while it can enhance the team’s identity and competitiveness, it also creates challenges in roster construction. Teams must carefully manage their budgets to accommodate the high salaries associated with franchise players, which directly impacts their ability to assemble a well-rounded and depth-rich roster.